Many investors often believe that a lower Net Asset Value (NAV)—the market price of a fund minus its liabilities—makes it cheaper and more advantageous to buy more units of a mutual fund. However, viewing lower NAV in isolation can be misleading and does not necessarily indicate the performance or overall value of the fund. Here's why investing based solely on a low NAV might not be the best strategy.
To illustrate this misconception, let's consider a simple example:
Imagine you have ₹10,000 to invest in one of two identical mutual fund schemes that have similar portfolios.
Now, assume both funds experience a market price appreciation of 10%. The NAV for each fund would change as follows:
Now, let's evaluate the market value of your investments:
This example clearly demonstrates that the returns remain the same for both schemes, even though one has a lower NAV than the other.
While lower NAV might seem appealing, it's crucial to understand that it only becomes relevant when funds offer substantial dividends. Dividends are paid out on a per-unit basis, meaning if you own more units, you may benefit from larger dividend payouts. Therefore, purchasing a fund with a low NAV could be advantageous if that fund consistently distributes significant dividends.
Another critical factor to consider is that if stock prices rise excessively, the value of those stocks may not continue to grow at the same pace. This scenario applies less to mutual fund units, where the NAV can become irrelevant. Thus, focusing solely on NAV can lead you to overlook potential growth in other key areas.
Rather than basing your investment decisions solely on NAV, consider these essential factors:
While a low NAV might appear attractive at first glance, it should not be the sole basis for your investment decisions. Instead, focus on comprehensive factors that reflect the fund's overall performance and potential.